In my last blog, I wrote of the opportunity to stand out from the crowd by helping the customer recognize that they are better off for having engaged us. Our techs play a huge role in this. They are in the best position to recognize the opportunities for improvement and typically have the trust and ear of the customer. However, the success of our efforts to engage our field teams in revenue generation depends on two key factors. The first is that the customer must see value in our technicians’ efforts. The second is that our technicians must see their proactive recommendations as an integral part of the job that they do. Achieving both outcomes relies on how we, as managers, define what the technicians are doing when they make recommendations to customers about a particular product or service. Do we regard the field service team’s efforts as “selling” or “serving”? Our perception of their actions can mean the difference between outstanding success and mediocrity.
“Selling”
Let’s start with the
“selling” perspective. Many service organizations
appear to take a “selling” perspective.
You hear it in the language that’s used.
Managers talk about getting their field service team to “sell”. They use
terms like “up-selling” and “cross-selling”.
Unfortunately, a “selling” perspective can have a negative impact on our
ability to fully engage our technicians in promoting our products and services.
A selling perspective is
centred on us – the service provider.
The focus is on how the customer can fulfill our needs. It arises
from the question, “How can we capitalize
on our field service relationships to win more business from our customers and
increase our revenues and profitability?”
This can be problematic for a
number of reasons:
Firstly, it can appear to
suggest that business development is an opportunistic tactic rather than an
integral part of the service strategy.
As such, it can be perceived
as an add-on to the tech’s main responsibility. If it’s perceived by the
technician as an add-on to, and not part of, their main role of providing
service, then the tech may regard making proactive recommendations as optional
and not enthusiastically participate.
Secondly, skills development
tends to be focused on selling.
Maslow
famously said: “If you only have a
hammer, you tend to see every problem as a nail.” When
we see the task as “selling”, we may conclude that the solution to improve our
techs’ performance is to provide them with selling skills. Unfortunately, some of the sales training for
techs has been adapted from sales programs developed for salespeople. Such programs often include topics that prove
uncomfortable for the technician – closing techniques, overcoming
objections are just two examples that come to mind. As a result, the technician may not see much
relevance to what they do every day in the training and some may even resent
being considered a “salesperson”.
Thirdly, a sales perspective
has the potential to negatively impact trust with the customer.
Our technicians typically
have high levels of trust with our customers, partly due to the fact that they’re
not there to sell the customer anything.
If we try to turn our technicians into salespeople, then the customer
may perceive that the technician is “selling” to them. When this happens, the customer becomes
confused about the tech’s role and that foundation of trust is eroded.
Fourthly, a selling
perspective is difficult to communicate to our customers.
How do we communicate to the
customer about our techs’ proactive efforts in a way that shows value for
them? Can you imagine if we said, “We’ve asked our technicians to look for
more products and services to sell to you so that we can get more money out of
you”. Somehow, I don’t think this would
resonate well with the customer.
“Serving”
When we see the proactive
recommendations by our field service team as a “service” rather than a “sale”,
we set the stage for enthusiastic engagement by our field service team and
welcome acceptance by our customers. That’s
because the focus changes from being centered on us as the service provider to
being centered on the customer and their needs.
Whereas the focus of the selling perspective is on how to get more money
out of the customer, the focus of a service perspective is on how we can
deliver a higher level of service to the customer through the recommendations
of our field service team.
When we take a “service”
perspective, identifying opportunities to help the customer becomes part
of the service rather than an add-on to it.
Skills development considerations broaden to include all that’s needed
to facilitate the techs’ efforts to share their recommendations with their
customers rather than limited to “selling” products or services. The techs’ efforts can add to the trust they
have built by demonstrating the value of their recommendations from the
customer’s perspective. And it becomes
easier to differentiate because we can discuss it with the customer in terms of
what is in it for them.
The “service” perspective
positions the tech’s recommendations as part of their job – as important a part
as their ability to repair and maintain the equipment they service. We enhance our service and add significant
value when our field service team makes recommendations to help our customers
to be measurably better off.
Reflection
On a scale of 1 – 10 (“10”
being “promoting products and services is
an important part of the service that we provide”, and “1” being “promoting products and services is not part
of my job and should be done by others”), how would you rate the general
view of your field service team of the role of promoting products and services?
What are the factors that
caused you to give the score that you did?
What steps could you take to increase your field team’s score to a “10”?
Let’s Connect
As always, I welcome your comments and questions. You can connect with me via telephone or email or leave a comment right here on the site. If you are reading this blog post via email, you will need to locate this post on my website by clicking here. Scroll down to the bottom of the page where you will find the comment section.
Jim Baston
President
BBA Consulting Group Inc.
It’s not what you look at that matters, it’s what
you see.
– Henry David Thoreau